![]() Does the service have supporting apps for iOS, Android, etc.? This can improve the experience of using the service significantly, especially on mobile devices.Unless you have a generous budget for collaborative software, you may sign up for a great-looking service only to discover later that there are serious limits on the number of team members, number of projects, or other harmless looking limitations that eventually come back to bite. Look carefully at the limitations on the free account for the services you consider.Does the service integrate tightly with some other existing service? If your team members are not managing their calendar and their documents in Google, or their friends through Facebook for example, they may dislike it if your choice of service requires them to change their existing workflow for things like calendars and documents, or have a profile on Facebook.Is the interface clean and does your interaction with it require a reloading of the page each time you click something? Surprisingly, some services I looked at still don’t use “ajax” dynamic coding so that when you mark a task complete or perform some other operation within the web interface for the service you have to wait while it reloads the entire page rather than performing that operation seamlessly.Instead of a full review then, let me just suggest some of the things you might want to look for when you set out on your own search for a collaborative task managing software or service: To be honest though, for any feature I might describe in Producteev, many if not most of its competitors that offer something similar. a host of small features that fit my needs.The huge range of options are bewildering but for now we have settled on using Producteev.Īmong the things I like about Producteev are these: Late last year I went on a search for a free and easy-to-use service that can help organize tasks for small groups of colleagues in my history department ranging from organizing conferences and workshops to writing up applications and other paperwork. Isn’t there a better way to manage communication, and especially connect communication to a series of tasks that are assigned to one or more individuals on a team? Many of us have had the experience of working together with small groups and finding ourselves drowning in an ocean of emails going back and forth. Software and services that once had little overlap are now offering similar feature sets for managing the tasks within projects. However, task management software and services for individuals are increasingly clashing with an equally competitive world of software and services for group collaboration. New options are appearing all the time, but I’ve long been a fan of Omnifocus and have good friends who swear by Things, both of which grow out of the Mac/iOS ecosystem. We’ve reviewed some of them here, including Todoist, Gqueues, Wunderlist, Basecamp, and Got Milk?. The world of software and online services is a densely populated field of companies who want you to share your to-do list with them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |